The New York Giants made a giant mistake.
Selecting Daniel Jones over Saquon Barkley was questionable on the time, and time has solely made it all of the extra evident.
Jones’ profession 12 months was a considerably common season for many quarterbacks.
He wasn’t a highly-rated quarterback popping out of highschool, was a walk-on at Duke, and wasn’t a coveted prospect once they took him within the first spherical of the NFL Draft.
However despite the fact that continuously committing to him has solely confirmed to be a mistake, the gamers nonetheless have his again.
Based on a report by Jordan Schultz, Giants gamers are indignant that, as dangerous as Jones has been, the choice to bench him was principally motivated by cash.
Sources: There’s “disappointment” amongst some #Giants gamers concerning how the Daniel Jones scenario was dealt with over the previous week, particularly with gamers conscious it was primarily a monetary determination by the group.
Dexter Lawrence publicly acknowledged on Tuesday: “He’s the… pic.twitter.com/BCZwrwYc5B
Dexter Lawrence even publicly mentioned he provides them the perfect probability to compete.
In truth, that is likely to be the case, however that doesn’t imply he’s an NFL-caliber beginning quarterback.
Wins aren’t a quarterback stat, however there’s no solution to justify holding him on the market after his 3-13 report since signing that contract extension.
Jones has a $23 million damage assure if he can’t go a bodily at the beginning of subsequent season, so the Giants want to make sure that’s not the case.
That’s why, given his subpar performances and endless struggles, it made sense to bench him.
NEXT:
Report: Insider Says 1 NFL Coach Is ‘Teaching For His Job’
